Skip to main content

Date and Time

Creation​

To create a new Date object call new Date() with one of the following arguments:

new Date()

let now = new Date();
alert( now ); // shows current date/time

new Date(milliseconds)

Create a Date object with the time equal to number of milliseconds (1/1000 of a second) passed after the Jan 1st of 1970 UTC+0.

// 0 means 01.01.1970 UTC+0
let Jan01_1970 = new Date(0);
alert( Jan01_1970 );

// now add 24 hours, get 02.01.1970 UTC+0
let Jan02_1970 = new Date(24 * 3600 * 1000);
alert( Jan02_1970 );

new Date(datestring)

let date = new Date("2017-01-26");
alert(date);
// The time is not set, so it's assumed to be midnight GMT and
// is adjusted according to the timezone the code is run in
// So the result could be
// Thu Jan 26 2017 11:00:00 GMT+1100 (Australian Eastern Daylight Time)
// or
// Wed Jan 25 2017 16:00:00 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time)

new Date(year, month, date, hours, minutes, seconds, ms)

  • The year should have 4 digits. For compatibility, 2 digits are also accepted and considered 19xx, e.g. 98 is the same as 1998 here, but always using 4 digits is strongly encouraged.
  • The month count starts with 0 (Jan), up to 11 (Dec).
  • The date parameter is actually the day of month, if absent then 1 is assumed.
  • If hours/minutes/seconds/ms is absent, they are assumed to be equal 0.
new Date(2011, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0); // 1 Jan 2011, 00:00:00
new Date(2011, 0, 1); // the same, hours etc are 0 by default

The maximal precision is 1 ms (1/1000 sec):

let date = new Date(2011, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 567);
alert( date ); // 1.01.2011, 02:03:04.567

Access date components​

getFullYear()

Get the year (4 digits)

getMonth()

Get the month, from 0 to 11.

getDate()

Get the day of month, from 1 to 31, the name of the method does look a little bit strange.

getHours(), getMinutes(), getSeconds(), getMilliseconds()

Get the corresponding time components.

Not getYear(), but getFullYear()

Many JavaScript engines implement a non-standard method getYear(). This method is deprecated. It returns 2-digit year sometimes. Please never use it. There is getFullYear() for the year.

getDay()

Get the day of week, from 0 (Sunday) to 6 (Saturday). The first day is always Sunday, in some countries that’s not so, but can’t be changed.

All the methods above return the components relative to the local time zone.

There are also their UTC-counterparts, that return day, month, year and so on for the time zone UTC+0: getUTCFullYear(), getUTCMonth(), getUTCDay(). Just insert the "UTC" right after "get".

If your local time zone is shifted relative to UTC, then the code below shows different hours:

// current date
let date = new Date();

// the hour in your current time zone
alert( date.getHours() );

// the hour in UTC+0 time zone (London time without daylight savings)
alert( date.getUTCHours() );

Besides the given methods, there are two special ones that do not have a UTC-variant:

getTime()

Returns the timestamp for the date – a number of milliseconds passed from the January 1st of 1970 UTC+0.

getTimezoneOffset()

Returns the difference between UTC and the local time zone, in minutes:

// if you are in timezone UTC-1, outputs 60
// if you are in timezone UTC+3, outputs -180
alert( new Date().getTimezoneOffset() );

Setting date components​

The following methods allow to set date/time components:

  • setFullYear(year, [month], [date])
  • setMonth(month, [date])
  • setDate(date)
  • setHours(hour, [min], [sec], [ms])
  • setMinutes(min, [sec], [ms])
  • setSeconds(sec, [ms])
  • setMilliseconds(ms)
  • setTime(milliseconds) (sets the whole date by milliseconds since 01.01.1970 UTC)

Every one of them except setTime() has a UTC-variant, for instance: setUTCHours().

let today = new Date();

today.setHours(0);
alert(today); // still today, but the hour is changed to 0

today.setHours(0, 0, 0, 0);
alert(today); // still today, now 00:00:00 sharp.

Autocorrection​

The autocorrection is a very handy feature of Date objects. We can set out-of-range values, and it will auto-adjust itself.

let date = new Date(2013, 0, 32); // 32 Jan 2013 ?!?
alert(date); // ...is 1st Feb 2013!

Out-of-range date components are distributed automatically.

Let’s say we need to increase the date “28 Feb 2016” by 2 days. It may be “2 Mar” or “1 Mar” in case of a leap-year. We don’t need to think about it. Just add 2 days. The Date object will do the rest:

let date = new Date(2016, 1, 28);
date.setDate(date.getDate() + 2);

alert( date ); // 1 Mar 2016

That feature is often used to get the date after the given period of time. For instance, let’s get the date for “70 seconds after now”:

let date = new Date();
date.setSeconds(date.getSeconds() + 70);

alert( date ); // shows the correct date

We can also set zero or even negative values. For example:

let date = new Date(2016, 0, 2); // 2 Jan 2016

date.setDate(1); // set day 1 of month
alert( date );

date.setDate(0); // min day is 1, so the last day of the previous month is assumed
alert( date ); // 31 Dec 2015

Date to number, date diff​

When a Date object is converted to number, it becomes the timestamp same as date.getTime():

let date = new Date();
alert(+date); // the number of milliseconds, same as date.getTime()

Date.now()​

If we only want to measure time, we don’t need the Date object.

There’s a special method Date.now() that returns the current timestamp.

It is semantically equivalent to new Date().getTime(), but it doesn’t create an intermediate Date object. So it’s faster and doesn’t put pressure on garbage collection.

It is used mostly for convenience or when performance matters, like in games in JavaScript or other specialized applications.

So this is probably better:

let start = Date.now(); // milliseconds count from 1 Jan 1970

// do the job
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
  let doSomething = i * i * i;
}

let end = Date.now(); // done

alert( `The loop took ${end - start} ms` ); // subtract numbers, not dates

Benchmarking​

If we want a reliable benchmark of CPU-hungry function, we should be careful.

For instance, let’s measure two functions that calculate the difference between two dates: which one is faster?

Such performance measurements are often called “benchmarks”.

// we have date1 and date2, which function faster returns their difference in ms?
function diffSubtract(date1, date2) {
  return date2 - date1;
}

// or
function diffGetTime(date1, date2) {
  return date2.getTime() - date1.getTime();
}

These two do exactly the same thing, but one of them uses an explicit date.getTime() to get the date in ms, and the other one relies on a date-to-number transform. Their result is always the same.

So, which one is faster?

The first idea may be to run them many times in a row and measure the time difference. For our case, functions are very simple, so we have to do it at least 100000 times.

Let’s measure:

function diffSubtract(date1, date2) {
  return date2 - date1;
}

function diffGetTime(date1, date2) {
  return date2.getTime() - date1.getTime();
}

function bench(f) {
  let date1 = new Date(0);
  let date2 = new Date();

  let start = Date.now();
  for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) f(date1, date2);
  return Date.now() - start;
}

alert( 'Time of diffSubtract: ' + bench(diffSubtract) + 'ms' );
alert( 'Time of diffGetTime: ' + bench(diffGetTime) + 'ms' );

Wow! Using getTime() is so much faster! That’s because there’s no type conversion, it is much easier for engines to optimize.

Okay, we have something. But that’s not a good benchmark yet.

Imagine that at the time of running bench(diffSubtract) CPU was doing something in parallel, and it was taking resources. And by the time of running bench(diffGetTime) that work has finished.

A pretty real scenario for a modern multi-process OS.

As a result, the first benchmark will have less CPU resources than the second. That may lead to wrong results.

For more reliable benchmarking, the whole pack of benchmarks should be rerun multiple times.

function diffSubtract(date1, date2) {
  return date2 - date1;
}

function diffGetTime(date1, date2) {
  return date2.getTime() - date1.getTime();
}

function bench(f) {
  let date1 = new Date(0);
  let date2 = new Date();

  let start = Date.now();
  for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) f(date1, date2);
  return Date.now() - start;
}

let time1 = 0;
let time2 = 0;

// run bench(diffSubtract) and bench(diffGetTime) each 10 times alternating
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
  time1 += bench(diffSubtract);
  time2 += bench(diffGetTime);
}

alert( 'Total time for diffSubtract: ' + time1 );
alert( 'Total time for diffGetTime: ' + time2 );

Modern JavaScript engines start applying advanced optimizations only to “hot code” that executes many times (no need to optimize rarely executed things). So, in the example above, first executions are not well-optimized. We may want to add a heat-up run:

// added for "heating up" prior to the main loop
bench(diffSubtract);
bench(diffGetTime);

// now benchmark
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
  time1 += bench(diffSubtract);
  time2 += bench(diffGetTime);
}

Date.parse from a string​

The method Date.parse(str) can read a date from a string.

The string format should be: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ, where:

  • YYYY-MM-DD – is the date: year-month-day.
  • The character "T" is used as the delimiter.
  • HH:mm:ss.sss – is the time: hours, minutes, seconds and milliseconds.
  • The optional 'Z' part denotes the time zone in the format +-hh:mm. A single letter Z would mean UTC+0.

Shorter variants are also possible, like YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-MM or even YYYY.

The call to Date.parse(str) parses the string in the given format and returns the timestamp (number of milliseconds from 1 Jan 1970 UTC+0). If the format is invalid, returns NaN.

For instance:

let ms = Date.parse('2012-01-26T13:51:50.417-07:00');

alert(ms); // 1327611110417  (timestamp)

We can instantly create a new Date object from the timestamp:

let date = new Date( Date.parse('2012-01-26T13:51:50.417-07:00') );

alert(date);